Surveillance of the source of poultry infections with Enterococcus hirae and Enterococcus cecorum in Slovenia and E. hirae antibiotic resistance patterns.

Enterococcus cecorum and Enterococcus hirae can cause locomotor problems, septicaemia, and endocarditis in broiler chickens. Understanding transmission routes and resistance patterns are essential for effective treatment. The aim of this study was to follow the same animals from the breeder flock to the hatchery and up to 14-day-old broiler chickens on the farm to find the source of E. cecorum and E. hirae. During the production cycle, only faeces and organs of broilers were E. hirae positive in all three sampled farms in which recurrent enterococcal infections were previously confirmed. None of the isolates possessed virulence genes. Based on resistance profiles, a variety of different strains were present in faeces and organs of different broilers' ages. Samples from the breeder flock and hatchery were negative. Faecal shedding on the farm and tolerance of enterococci to the environmental conditions enable persistence of pathogenic enterococci in farm dust; therefore, adequate cleaning and disinfection after depopulation of the farms could prevent disease recurrence in the new cycle. Susceptibility testing of E. hirae isolates showed no resistance to the drugs of choice for the treatment of enterococcal infections in poultry.

Does monensin in chicken manure from poultry farms pose a threat to soil invertebrates?

Monensin is a carboxylic polyether ionophore used in the poultry industry as a coccidiostat. It enters the environment via manure from broiler farms. In spite of its potential presence in the environment, information concerning monensin residues in manure and soil and its toxicity to soil organisms are insufficient. In the present study, two beneficial soil invertebrate species, earthworms (Eisenia andrei) and woodlice (Porcellio scaber), were used to assess the toxicity of monensin. Animals were exposed to a range of monensin concentrations via soil or food. Earthworm reproduction was found to be the most susceptible endpoint (NOEC=3.5 mg kg(-1) dry soil; EC(50)=12.7 mg kg(-1) dry soil), while no adverse effects were recorded in isopods (NOEC⩾849mgkg(-1) dry soil, NOEC⩾357mgkg(-1) dry food). The obtained toxicity data were compared with potential concentrations of monensin in soil. In view of this, manure from broiler chickens treated with monensin at a poultry farm was sampled. According to monensin and nitrogen concentrations in the chicken manure and the degradation time of monensin, the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) was calculated. PEC of monensin is around 0.013 mg kg(-1) soil if manure is used after 3 months of composting and 0.05 mg kg(-1) soil if used without storage. Data for earthworm reproduction was used to estimate the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC). If fresh chicken manure is applied to terrestrial ecosystems, the risk quotient (PEC/PNEC ratio) is above 1, which indicates that monensin might pose an environmental risk under certain conditions. To prevent this, it is strongly recommended to compost chicken manure for several months before using it as fertiliser.